ai-agent-book 精选快照（<2MB 代码与文档，来自 github.com/bojieli/ai-agent-book）

chapter9/hermes-self-evolution/acceptance_review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# Independent acceptance review of the self-update
+
+Act as the terminal reviewer in a proposer-reviewer self-evolution loop. You
+are inspecting a Hermes checkout that started from commit
+`85c8956ec7f2b4607509980794995e1c5e21e292` and now contains an uncommitted
+candidate self-update produced by another Hermes session after reading all of
+*AI Agents in Depth*. The proposer was not given any candidate improvement or
+alleged capability gap; it selected this change itself.
+
+Review the current diff and `BOOK_SELF_EVOLUTION_REPORT.md`. Inspect the actual
+production trajectory conversion and persistence paths rather than trusting
+the report. Determine whether the new evaluation metadata correctly derives
+conservative signals from the real persisted ShareGPT-format trajectory,
+preserves existing trajectory content and compatibility, and accurately
+documents its evidence boundary.
+
+Run these checks yourself (and any additional focused read-only checks needed):
+
+```bash
+uv run --with pytest pytest tests/agent/test_trajectory.py -q
+uv run --with pytest pytest tests/test_trajectory_compressor.py -q
+python3 -m py_compile agent/trajectory.py agent/agent_runtime_helpers.py run_agent.py
+git diff --check
+```
+
+Do not edit any file. Reject the candidate if you find a concrete correctness,
+production/test-parity, persistence, compatibility, safety, or material
+report-accuracy defect. Do not reject merely because this bounded candidate
+does not implement every opportunity found in the book or because no downstream
+ablation campaign has run; those are explicit evidence boundaries.
+
+Give concise evidence for the decision. End with exactly one machine-readable
+line:
+
+`VERDICT: ACCEPT`
+
+or
+
+`VERDICT: REJECT`
+
+If rejecting, list actionable findings above that final line.