ai-agent-book 精选快照(<2MB 代码与文档,来自 github.com/bojieli/ai-agent-book)
Build latest book artifacts / build (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.11) (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.13) (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / build (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / deploy (push) Canceled after 0s
i18n consistency check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/context-compression) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/prompt-injection) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/system-hint) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter3/log-sanitization) (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / test (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / agentbook (push) Canceled after 0s
Build latest book artifacts / build (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.11) (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.13) (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / build (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / deploy (push) Canceled after 0s
i18n consistency check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/context-compression) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/prompt-injection) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/system-hint) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter3/log-sanitization) (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / test (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / agentbook (push) Canceled after 0s
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
# Independent review of the first candidate
|
||||
|
||||
An independent reviewer rejected the first candidate pending correction. Read
|
||||
the current diff and `BOOK_SELF_EVOLUTION_REPORT.md`, then address these exact
|
||||
findings without expanding scope:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The request-local status is not prefix-stable across the tool loop. On call
|
||||
1 it is appended to the user API copy; on call 2 that historical user copy
|
||||
loses the status. On later calls, the previous tool result loses its old
|
||||
status before the newest tool result gains a new one. This changes prior
|
||||
wire bytes and invalidates the cached suffix, conflicting with Hermes'
|
||||
byte-stability rule. Use a persistent-append design (for example, stable
|
||||
`api_content` sidecars) or another design that proves previously sent wire
|
||||
messages remain byte-identical. Keep clean transcript content unchanged.
|
||||
2. The tests exercise only the formatter. Add behavior-contract coverage for
|
||||
the actual attachment/replay mechanism over at least three successive API
|
||||
requests. Assert that each earlier wire message is byte-identical in every
|
||||
later request and that the newest status is closest to generation.
|
||||
3. Correct the report's contradictory verification wording: the repository
|
||||
wrapper was blocked because its environment lacked pytest, but the focused
|
||||
tests did execute and pass through `uv run --with pytest`.
|
||||
|
||||
Run the focused tests, relevant existing replay/cache tests, compilation, and
|
||||
`git diff --check`. Update the report with the review round and exact results.
|
||||
Do not claim end-to-end benefit without an ablation campaign, do not push or
|
||||
commit, and do not edit the book repository.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user