liqiang
b119135836
Build latest book artifacts / build (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.11) (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.13) (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / build (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / deploy (push) Canceled after 0s
i18n consistency check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/context-compression) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/prompt-injection) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/system-hint) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter3/log-sanitization) (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / test (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / agentbook (push) Canceled after 0s
68 lines
7.8 KiB
JSON
68 lines
7.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"signature": "40d919072277dbcf0a8bca406c2c16bfc0e73f4f20db060bf993b2d923f77b7c",
|
||
"parsed": {
|
||
"narration": "承接上一页对论文的整体介绍，我们先看屏幕上的标题：现有方法到底卡在哪里。上面一栏是RNN家族，包括LSTM和GRU，它们天生要一个词一个词地顺序计算，训练时没法并行，距离很远的词之间也难以建立联系。于是有人转向卷积，也就是下面提到的ByteNet和ConvS2S，并行问题是缓解了，但请注意最后一行：两个位置离得越远，所需操作就越多，ConvS2S是线性增长，ByteNet是对数增长。这两个瓶颈正是作者寻找新方案的动机，下一页我们就看注意力机制如何绕开它们。",
|
||
"visual_references": [
|
||
"页面标题“Background: The Problem with Existing Approaches”",
|
||
"“Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs/LSTMs/GRUs)”一栏",
|
||
"“ByteNet, ConvS2S”字样",
|
||
"“Linear (ConvS2S) or logarithmic (ByteNet) path lengths”一行"
|
||
]
|
||
},
|
||
"receipt": {
|
||
"provider": "Moonshot",
|
||
"request": {
|
||
"model": "kimi-k3",
|
||
"messages": [
|
||
{
|
||
"role": "user",
|
||
"content": "你是一位严谨而自然的中文技术讲师，正在讲解论文 Attention Is All You Need。\n这是第 3/12 页。下面给出该页真实 Slidev 源码：\n<slide>\n## Background: The Problem with Existing Approaches\n\n### Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs/LSTMs/GRUs)\n- Inherently sequential computation\n- Cannot parallelize within training examples\n- Difficult to learn long-range dependencies\n\n### Convolutional Approaches\n- ByteNet, ConvS2S use CNNs for parallelization\n- Number of operations grows with distance between positions\n- Linear (ConvS2S) or logarithmic (ByteNet) path lengths\n</slide>\n请写一段 180–240 个中文字符左右的口语讲解。必须满足：\n1. 用引导性叙事解释“为什么”和“它与前后页的关系”，不能逐条照读幻灯片；\n2. 明确指向当前屏幕上的可见元素（标题、公式、表格、数值或图片）；有图片/表格/公式时必须说出观众该看哪里；\n3. 不虚构源码中没有的数值或结论；开头/结尾与页序匹配；\n4. 只返回 JSON：{\"narration\":\"...\",\"visual_references\":[\"...\"]}。\n"
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"temperature": 1,
|
||
"max_tokens": 1200,
|
||
"response_format": {
|
||
"type": "json_object"
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
"response": {
|
||
"id": "chatcmpl-6a6a7edd32ee9d9a48768e53",
|
||
"choices": [
|
||
{
|
||
"finish_reason": "stop",
|
||
"index": 0,
|
||
"logprobs": null,
|
||
"message": {
|
||
"content": "{\"narration\":\"承接上一页对论文的整体介绍，我们先看屏幕上的标题：现有方法到底卡在哪里。上面一栏是RNN家族，包括LSTM和GRU，它们天生要一个词一个词地顺序计算，训练时没法并行，距离很远的词之间也难以建立联系。于是有人转向卷积，也就是下面提到的ByteNet和ConvS2S，并行问题是缓解了，但请注意最后一行：两个位置离得越远，所需操作就越多，ConvS2S是线性增长，ByteNet是对数增长。这两个瓶颈正是作者寻找新方案的动机，下一页我们就看注意力机制如何绕开它们。\",\"visual_references\":[\"页面标题“Background: The Problem with Existing Approaches”\",\"“Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs/LSTMs/GRUs)”一栏\",\"“ByteNet, ConvS2S”字样\",\"“Linear (ConvS2S) or logarithmic (ByteNet) path lengths”一行\"]}",
|
||
"refusal": null,
|
||
"role": "assistant",
|
||
"annotations": null,
|
||
"audio": null,
|
||
"function_call": null,
|
||
"tool_calls": null,
|
||
"reasoning_content": "The user wants a spoken narration for slide 3/12 of \"Attention Is All You Need\" presentation. The slide covers Background: The Problem with Existing Approaches — RNNs (sequential, no parallelization, long-range dependency issues) and Convolutional approaches (ByteNet, ConvS2S, path lengths linear/logarithmic).\n\nRequirements:\n- 180–240 Chinese characters\n- Guiding narrative explaining \"why\" and relation to previous/next pages\n- Point to visible elements on screen\n- No fabricated numbers\n- Match page order (this is page 3, so previous page likely introduced the paper/intro, next pages will introduce the Transformer solution)\n- Return only JSON with narration and visual_references\n\nLet me write natural, spoken Chinese, around 180-240 characters.\n\nDraft:\n\"上一页我们了解了这篇论文的基本背景，现在请看屏幕上的标题——现有方法的问题。为什么需要新架构呢？先看RNN家族，包括LSTM和GRU：它们本质上必须按顺序计算，一个词一个词地处理，训练时无法并行，而且距离远的词之间信息传递困难。那卷积方法呢？比如ByteNet和ConvS2S，它们确实实现了并行，但大家注意幻灯片上这一行：位置之间的距离越远，需要的操作就越多——ConvS2S是线性增长，ByteNet是对数增长。正是这两个痛点，引出了下一页要讲的、完全基于注意力的Transformer方案。\"\n\nCount characters: Let me roughly count. That's probably around 200-220 characters. Good.\n\nVisual references: the title \"Background: The Problem with Existing Approaches\", RNN section, ConvS2S/ByteNet names, linear/logarithmic path lengths line.\n\nLet me refine and count more carefully.\n\nNarration draft:\n\"承接上一页对论文的整体介绍，我们先看屏幕上的标题：现有方法到底卡在哪里。左边是RNN家族，包括LSTM和GRU，它们天生要一个词一个词地顺序计算，训练时没法并行，长距离的词之间也很难建立联系。于是有人转向卷积，也就是下面提到的ByteNet和ConvS2S，并行是解决了，但请注意这行字：两个位置离得越远，所需操作就越多，ConvS2S是线性增长，ByteNet是对数增长。这两个瓶颈，正是作者提出全新方案的动机，下一页我们就看Transformer如何绕开它们。\"\n\nRough count: Let me count in segments:\n\"承接上一页对论文的整体介绍，\" = 14\n\"我们先看屏幕上的标题：\" = 11 (25)\n\"现有方法到底卡在哪里。\" = 11 (36)\n\"左边是RNN家族，\" = ~9 (45)\n\"包括LSTM和GRU，\" ~10 (55)\n\"它们天生要一个词一个词地顺序计算，\" = 17 (72)\n\"训练时没法并行，\" = 8 (80)\n\"长距离的词之间也很难建立联系。\" = 14 (94)\n\"于是有人转向卷积，\" = 9 (103)\n\"也就是下面提到的ByteNet和ConvS2S，\" ~16 (119)\n\"并行是解决了，\" = 7 (126)\n\"但请注意这行字：\" = 8 (134)\n\"两个位置离得越远，\" = 9 (143)\n\"所需操作就越多，\" = 8 (151)\n\"ConvS2S是线性增长，\" ~13 (164)\n\"ByteNet是对数增长。\" ~11 (175)\n\"这两个瓶颈，\" = 6 (181)\n\"正是作者提出全新方案的动机，\" = 13 (194)\n\"下一页我们就看Transformer如何绕开它们。\" ~21 (215)\n\nAround 215 characters. Good, within 180-240.\n\nVisual references: \n- \"标题 'Background: The Problem with Existing Approaches'\"\n- \"RNNs/LSTMs/GRUs 一栏\"\n- \"ConvS2S 与 ByteNet 名称\"\n- \"'Linear (ConvS2S) or logarithmic (ByteNet) path lengths' 一行\"\n\nReturn only JSON."
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
],
|
||
"created": 1785364190,
|
||
"model": "kimi-k3",
|
||
"object": "chat.completion",
|
||
"service_tier": null,
|
||
"system_fingerprint": null,
|
||
"usage": {
|
||
"completion_tokens": 1065,
|
||
"prompt_tokens": 394,
|
||
"total_tokens": 1459,
|
||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||
"accepted_prediction_tokens": null,
|
||
"audio_tokens": null,
|
||
"reasoning_tokens": 850,
|
||
"rejected_prediction_tokens": null
|
||
},
|
||
"prompt_tokens_details": null
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
"elapsed_ms": 31874.737
|
||
}
|
||
}
|