Files
ai-agent-book/chapter3/contextual-retrieval-for-user-memory/LLM_EVALUATION.md
T
liqiang b119135836
Build latest book artifacts / build (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.11) (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.13) (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / build (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / deploy (push) Canceled after 0s
i18n consistency check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/context-compression) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/prompt-injection) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/system-hint) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter3/log-sanitization) (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / test (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / agentbook (push) Canceled after 0s
ai-agent-book 精选快照(<2MB 代码与文档,来自 github.com/bojieli/ai-agent-book)
2026-08-20 13:12:50 +00:00

5.9 KiB

LLM Evaluation Integration

This project now includes automatic LLM-based evaluation of agent responses, similar to the week2/user-memory project. When an agent generates a response, it is automatically evaluated for accuracy and completeness.

🎯 Overview

The LLM evaluation system automatically:

  1. Evaluates agent responses after generation
  2. Assigns a continuous reward score (0.0 to 1.0)
  3. Determines pass/fail based on threshold (>= 0.6)
  4. Provides detailed reasoning for the evaluation
  5. Checks if required information was found

📋 Features

Automatic Evaluation

  • Triggered automatically after agent generates response
  • No manual intervention required
  • Integrated into the existing evaluation pipeline

Evaluation Metrics

  • Reward Score: Continuous score from 0.0 to 1.0
    • 0.0-0.2: Complete failure
    • 0.2-0.4: Poor performance
    • 0.4-0.6: Partial success
    • 0.6-0.8: Good performance
    • 0.8-1.0: Excellent performance
  • Pass/Fail: Determined by reward >= 0.6
  • Reasoning: Detailed explanation of the score
  • Required Information: Verification of key facts

Console Output

When evaluation runs, you'll see:

============================================================
Running LLM Evaluation...
------------------------------------------------------------
LLM Evaluation Reward: 0.850/1.000
Passed: Yes
Reasoning: The agent correctly recalled the account number from the conversation history.
Required Information Found:
  ✓ account number: 123456789
  ✓ routing number: 071000013
  ✗ pin number: not found
============================================================

🔧 Implementation

Integration Points

  1. evaluator.py

    • Imports LLMEvaluator from week2/user-memory-evaluation
    • Initializes evaluator if available
    • Runs evaluation after agent response
    • Adds results to EvaluationResult
  2. main.py

    • Displays LLM evaluation results in UI
    • Shows reward score and pass/fail status
    • Lists required information checks
  3. Report Generation

    • Includes LLM evaluation metrics
    • Shows average reward scores
    • Tracks evaluation success rates

Code Changes

The key changes include:

# In evaluator.py - Automatic evaluation after agent response
if self.llm_evaluator and agent_answer:
    llm_result = self.llm_evaluator.evaluate(
        test_case=eval_test_case,
        agent_response=agent_answer,
        extracted_memory=None
    )
    
    # Process and log results
    logger.info(f"LLM Evaluation Reward: {llm_result.reward:.3f}/1.000")
    logger.info(f"Passed: {'Yes' if llm_result.passed else 'No'}")

📊 Evaluation Flow

User Question
    ↓
Agent Processing (RAG)
    ↓
Agent Response Generated
    ↓
[AUTOMATIC LLM EVALUATION]
    ├─ Send response to LLM
    ├─ Get reward score
    ├─ Check required info
    └─ Generate reasoning
    ↓
Display Results
    ├─ Agent answer
    ├─ LLM evaluation score
    ├─ Pass/fail status
    └─ Required info checks

🚀 Usage

Running with Evaluation

  1. Single Test Case:

    python main.py
    # Select option 4: Evaluate Single Test Case
    # LLM evaluation runs automatically
    
  2. Batch Evaluation:

    python main.py --mode batch --category layer1
    # All test cases evaluated with LLM
    
  3. Check Integration:

    python test_llm_evaluation.py
    

Viewing Results

Results include LLM evaluation details:

  • In console output during evaluation
  • In generated reports
  • In saved result files

📈 Benefits

  1. Objective Assessment: Consistent evaluation criteria
  2. Detailed Feedback: Reasoning for each score
  3. Automatic Verification: Checks required information
  4. Performance Tracking: Monitor improvement over time
  5. No Manual Review: Reduces human evaluation burden

⚙️ Configuration

Requirements

  • Access to week2/user-memory-evaluation module
  • Valid API keys for LLM evaluation
  • OpenAI-compatible API endpoint

Environment Variables

# For LLM evaluation (if using OpenAI)
OPENAI_API_KEY=your_key

# Or configure evaluator in week2/user-memory-evaluation/config.py

Disabling Evaluation

If LLM evaluation is not available:

  • System continues to work normally
  • Only RAG metrics are shown
  • Manual evaluation still possible

📝 Example Output

Successful Evaluation

Test: layer1_01_bank_account
Agent Answer: Your checking account number is 4429853327.

LLM Evaluation:
  Passed: Yes ✓
  Reward Score: 0.920/1.000
  Reasoning: The agent correctly extracted and provided the exact account number from the conversation. The response is accurate and directly addresses the user's question.
  
Required Information:
  ✓ checking account number
  ✓ account number format

Failed Evaluation

Test: layer2_01_multiple_vehicles
Agent Answer: You have a Honda Accord.

LLM Evaluation:
  Passed: No ✗
  Reward Score: 0.450/1.000
  Reasoning: The agent only mentioned one vehicle when the user has multiple vehicles. Missing information about the Tesla Model 3 and service scheduling details.
  
Required Information:
  ✓ Honda Accord mentioned
  ✗ Tesla Model 3 not mentioned
  ✗ Service scheduling information missing

🔍 Troubleshooting

LLM Evaluator Not Available

  • Check week2/user-memory-evaluation exists
  • Verify evaluator.py is present
  • Ensure API keys are configured

Evaluation Errors

  • Check API key validity
  • Verify network connectivity
  • Review error logs for details

Inconsistent Scores

  • LLM evaluation is probabilistic
  • Use temperature=0 for consistency
  • Review evaluation criteria