Build latest book artifacts / build (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.11) (push) Canceled after 0s
dependency resolution / resolve (3.13) (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / build (push) Canceled after 0s
deploy-pages / deploy (push) Canceled after 0s
i18n consistency check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/context-compression) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/prompt-injection) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter2/system-hint) (push) Canceled after 0s
provider adoption tests / test (chapter3/log-sanitization) (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / test (push) Canceled after 0s
web-search-agent tests / agentbook (push) Canceled after 0s
7.0 KiB
7.0 KiB
theme, title, info, author, transition, mdc, lineNumbers, monaco, aspectRatio, canvasWidth, layout, class
| theme | title | info | author | transition | mdc | lineNumbers | monaco | aspectRatio | canvasWidth | layout | class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seriph | Lesson 01 — How Do We Replace Agent Intuition with Evidence? | English video course for AI Agents in Depth | Bojie Li | slide-left | true | false | false | 16/9 | 980 | cover | cover |
Build · Introduction · Orientation
How Do We Replace Agent Intuition with Evidence?
A practice-first map of AI Agents in Depth
Lesson 01 of 42 · 16 minutes · Introduction; Book Structure; How to Read This Book
layout: center class: text-center
The central question
Why do impressive Agent demos so often fail to become reliable products?
Why this problem matters
Demo success
One lucky trajectory proves possibility—not reliability.
Engineering judgment
Every design choice needs a mechanism and a trade-off.
Scientific progress
Without evaluation, change is indistinguishable from luck.
Three ideas to keep in view
Build
Context, knowledge, tools, and code generation
Improve
Evaluation, post-training, and continual evolution
Expand
Voice, Computer Use, robotics, and collaboration
The book's visual model
The four-part structure of the book
Demo-driven vs. Principle-driven
Demo-driven
- Start with a framework
- Celebrate one successful run
- Change prompts by intuition
Principle-driven
- Start with a failure mode
- Run a controlled comparison
- Turn evidence into a design rule
The course follows the right-hand loop.
The course's experimental loop
question = define_failure_mode()
hypothesis = predict_mechanism(question)
evidence = run_controlled_experiment(hypothesis)
rule = interpret(evidence, limitations=True)
evaluate(rule)
Test the claim
Course tour1 min
Inspect one companion experiment before running it
Observe: Entry point, modes, providers, outputs, and reproducibility controls
Demo budget: 1 minute · one contiguous terminal block
class: course-terminal
Live demo
Switching to the terminal
$ uv run python chapter1/context/main.py --help
Run the command(s), narrate decisions, and point to the observation—not just the output.
What the evidence supports
Finding 1
The book is organized around recurring engineering questions, not products.
Finding 2
Experiments expose mechanisms through controls, ablations, and receipts.
Finding 3
The author's interpretation—not terminal output alone—is the course's value.
layout: center
Where the claim stops
Boundary condition
A short lesson cannot reproduce every long-running campaign. It can make the protocol and evidence traceable.
layout: center
Engineering takeaway
Design rule
Never present an Agent result without first stating what would count as success or failure.
Continue the experiment
Learning paths
docs/en/LEARNING.md
Book prerequisites
book-en/introduction.md
Companion project index
docs/en/README.md
layout: center class: text-center
Pause and apply
Your turn
Which Agent claim have you accepted after seeing only one successful run?
layout: center class: text-center
Introduction complete · Next · Lesson 02
Define an Agent by the interfaces that connect it to the world.
→